Peter.Morton
35a98c6d4b
Phase 0 (Research):
- Selected MCP SDK (@modelcontextprotocol/sdk) for protocol compliance
- Chose ioredis for Valkey client (Redis-compatible)
- Minimal dependencies: Pino logging, native test runner
- Docker buildx bake for multi-platform builds
- Embedded mock data with deterministic generation
- PNR format: TEST-{BASE32} for safety
Phase 1 (Design):
- Data model: 8 core entities (Session, PNR, FlightSegment, etc.)
- MCP contracts: 8 tools with JSON schemas
- Quickstart guide with complete workflow examples
- Constitution compliance verified
Technical stack:
- Node.js 20 LTS
- Valkey 8.0+ for persistence
- Docker containers (amd64/arm64)
- Performance: <2s search, 50+ concurrent sessions
Ready for task generation with /speckit.tasks
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
3.8 KiB
3.8 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Mock GDS MCP Server
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2025-01-22
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Validation Summary
Status: ✅ PASSED
All checklist items have been validated:
Content Quality
- ✅ Specification is technology-agnostic - no mention of specific programming languages, frameworks, databases, or implementation technologies
- ✅ All content focuses on WHAT users need (testing/demos) and WHY (development efficiency, reliable workflows)
- ✅ Written in plain language suitable for stakeholders - uses business terms (developers, QA teams, sales demos) rather than technical jargon
- ✅ All mandatory sections (User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria, Assumptions) are complete and detailed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - all requirements are fully specified with concrete details
- ✅ Each functional requirement is testable - FR-002 can be tested by executing searches with specified parameters and verifying outputs; FR-009 can be tested by running concurrent sessions and checking for data leakage
- ✅ All success criteria include specific metrics (SC-001: 30 seconds, SC-002: 50 concurrent sessions, SC-003: under 2 seconds, SC-004: 100% valid codes)
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic - no implementation details (e.g., SC-001 measures workflow completion time, not "API response time")
- ✅ 5 user stories with 15 total acceptance scenarios covering all major workflows (flight booking, multi-service, car rental, session isolation, demo data)
- ✅ 8 edge cases identified covering error scenarios (invalid codes, cancelled bookings, session expiry, validation failures)
- ✅ Scope clearly bounded in Assumptions section - defines what's included (major airports, common workflows) and excluded (comprehensive airport coverage, complex fare rules, production use)
- ✅ 12 assumptions documented covering data scope, pricing, payment handling, session management, and target users
Feature Readiness
- ✅ Each FR has corresponding acceptance scenarios - FR-002 (flight search) maps to User Story 1 acceptance scenario 1; FR-009 (session isolation) maps to User Story 4 scenarios
- ✅ User scenarios cover all primary flows: basic flight booking (P1), multi-service bundling (P2), complete packages (P3), concurrent testing (P2), demo scenarios (P3)
- ✅ Success criteria align with feature goals: rapid workflow completion (SC-001), concurrent session support (SC-002), realistic data quality (SC-004, SC-006), testing effectiveness (SC-005, SC-008)
- ✅ No implementation leakage detected - specification never mentions MCP implementation details, data storage mechanisms, or specific tool implementations
Notes
Specification is ready for next phase. Can proceed directly to /speckit.plan for implementation planning, or optionally run /speckit.clarify if additional stakeholder input is desired (though no clarifications are currently needed).