# Specification Quality Checklist: OIDC Proxy Script Authentication

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2025-07-16
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

All checklist items pass. The spec is ready for `/speckit.plan` or `/speckit.clarify`.

Reviewer notes:
- FR-009 through FR-011 reference specific file paths and injected dependencies. These are treated as architecture constraints (not implementation choices), as they are dictated by the VM sandbox execution model defined in the project constitution.
- The `expires_in` interpretation (absolute epoch vs relative duration) is documented as an assumption based on the example value `1532618185`. If this assumption is incorrect, FR-006 should be updated accordingly before planning.