# Specification Quality Checklist: Obsidian MCP Bundle

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-03-22
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Validation Results

**Status**: ✅ PASSED

All quality checks passed successfully:

1. **Content Quality**: The specification focuses entirely on WHAT users need and WHY they need it. No implementation details about Node.js, specific MCP SDK usage patterns, or code structure are present. The spec is written for stakeholders who understand Obsidian but not necessarily development.

2. **Requirement Completeness**: All 25 functional requirements are testable and unambiguous. No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers exist. Success criteria use measurable metrics (time, percentages, counts) without referencing specific technologies.

3. **Feature Readiness**: The specification is comprehensive and ready for planning phase. User stories are prioritized (P1-P5) and independently testable. Edge cases are well-documented. Assumptions are clearly stated.

## Notes

- Specification covers 5 prioritized user stories representing incremental value delivery
- Edge cases comprehensively address common failure scenarios
- Assumptions section documents runtime dependencies (Obsidian CLI, vault configuration)
- Success criteria balance performance, reliability, and user experience metrics
- Ready to proceed with `/speckit.plan` or `/speckit.clarify` (though clarification not needed)