Peter.Morton
9286ee8927
Adds HTTP response header containing original Google Drive URL for exported documents to enable content traceability and auditing. - Adds X-Verint-KAB-Original-URL header to successful export responses - Header format: https://drive.google.com/file/d/{fileId} - Present for all export formats (PDF, DOCX, plain text) - Header omitted on error responses (4xx/5xx) - 18 new tests (9 contract + 9 integration) - Zero new dependencies - Performance: 0.000019ms overhead per request Implements: - FR-001: Header present on successful exports (200 OK) - FR-002: Header absent on error responses - FR-003: Standard header name X-Verint-KAB-Original-URL - FR-004: Standard URL format with file ID - FR-005: Uses validated document.id from Google Drive API - FR-006: Header present regardless of file accessibility - FR-007: Consistent across all export formats - FR-008: Minimal performance impact (< 5ms requirement) Testing: - Contract tests validate header presence, format, and error handling - Integration tests verify behavior across formats and permissions - All 18 tests passing - 100% requirements coverage Documentation: - Feature specification (specs/001-gdrive-url-header/spec.md) - Implementation plan (plan.md) - Technical research (research.md) - Data model (data-model.md) - API contract (contracts/response-headers.md) - User guide (quickstart.md) Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
44 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Google Drive Original URL Header
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-27
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Validation Results
|
|
|
|
**Status**: ✅ **PASSED** - All quality checks passed
|
|
|
|
**Clarifications Resolved**:
|
|
- FR-006: User selected Option B - Include header with empty/null value when document ID cannot be determined
|
|
|
|
**Notes**:
|
|
- Specification is ready for planning phase
|
|
- All requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- Success criteria are measurable and technology-agnostic
|
|
- Ready to proceed with `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|